white nuclear plant silo under orange sky at sunset
Photo by Johannes Plenio on Pexels.com
Read: 2 min

Protestors, backed by opposition parties, Wednesday pressed the government to overturn regulatory approval for a nuclear waste dump upriver from Canada’s capital, fearing the contamination of its drinking water.

Indigenous chiefs and elders, leaders of the Bloc Quebecois and Green Party and several environmental groups are pushing back against a Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission decision last month to approve the waste site in the town of Chalk River, 180 kilometres north of Ottawa.

“The disposal site is only one kilometre from the Ottawa River, and we’re worried about leakage,” said protestor Tammy Pizendewatch Twashi.

The river provides drinking water to the capital’s more than one million residents and 140 nearby communities.

“Water is life,” said Chief Lance Haymond of the Kebaowek First Nation, speaking to a small crowd outside Parliament. “We need to protect it.”

The tribe has launched one of several legal challenges of the project.

Haymond expressed concerns that any river pollution could lead to health issues and spoil habitat for bears and a number of at-risk animal and plant species.

The disposal facility at Chalk River Laboratories is to store up to one million cubic metres (35.3 million cubic feet) of nuclear waste.

Chalk River Laboratories was built in 1944 and was the site of the world’s first nuclear reactor meltdown in December 1952 and saw one again in 1958.

Before being decommissioned, the lab developed nuclear reactors, conducted nuclear weapons research and was at one time a major supplier of medical isotopes used to diagnose and treat cancers.

The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission said in a statement it would store mostly contaminated materials from environmental remediation and the decommissioning of the site in 2018, as well as from its past operations as a nuclear laboratory.

Waste from hospitals and universities would also be shipped there to be stored in the “containment mound.”

The regulator insisted the project “is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects,” and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday declined to intervene.

“This is not a political decision,” he told the Commons, adding it should be left to experts.

Leave a comment

This space exists to enable readers to engage with each other and Canadian Affairs staff. Please keep your comments respectful. By commenting, you agree to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We encourage you to report inappropriate comments to us by emailing contact@canadianaffairs.news.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *