A new empirical study challenges the popular narrative that Canada’s Supreme Court has become more divided under its current chief justice, Richard Wagner.
Wagner replaced Justice Beverley McLachlin as head of Canada’s highest court in December 2017. Unlike McLachlin, who was known to encourage consensus and unanimity, Wagner has publicly stated that he likes civil dissent and welcomes it in his Court.
The study’s authors, partners at prominent Canadian law firms, analyzed Supreme Court decisions from 1984 through 2022. They found that while the Wagner Court does exhibit higher levels of disagreement than earlier Courts, “some of this increased disagreement is of a nature that may be less concerning at an institutional level than the headline numbers suggest.”
When asked why the level of disagreement on the Court matters, study co-author Jeremy Opolsky told Canadian Affairs: “I think that we are inevitably affected by the zeitgeist that is the Supreme Court of the United States.”
Register to read the full article.
Already have an account? Sign In.
Register for free for:
- Access to ten free articles per month
- Our weekly roundup of top stories
- Monthly newsletters on topics of your choice
- Unlimited article access each month
- Crosswords and puzzles on Canadian holidays
- Full newsletter access